Squirrel Seeks Chipmunk

This blog post is about squirrel seeks chipmunk by David Sedaris. It is a collection of short stories about animals. I think that these stories are a lot like Aesop's fables, they teach a lesson. My favorite one so far is about a vigilant rabbit, who is supposed to guard a section of the forest so no animals can come in and disturb the peace. Some animals come and try to get over the fence the rabbit built, and are rude to him in the process, so he kills them. It is a brutal tale. One day, a unicorn comes to the fence an tries to convince the rabbit to let him by, but the rabbit, determined to keep the forest safe, refuses to let the unicorn enter the woods. When the unicorn jumps over the fence, instead of staying by the fence, guarding against real dangers, he chased the unicorn, watching as the unicorn uses his horn to heal the wounded, grow flowers, and making dead grass a fresh green color. Even though the unicorn was obviously doing amazing things for the forest, the rabbit only cared about the fact that the unicorn came into the forest without his consent. While the unicorn slept, he gnawed off his gleaming horn, leaving the unicorn weaponless, and magicless. When the unicorn woke, he was just an ordinary horse. Then, the rabbit spit out a diamond because the horn was magical. He was busy staring at it, and then the wolves came. Thats how it ends. The story. I dont much like the ending, I think it's depressing, like why cant the rabbit spit out a million gems, and then make the forest better by building a stronger barrier around it, or buy plant seeds so that there is tons of food in the forest, but then he wouldnt learn his lesson, would he? I guess thats what the whole story is about. I think that the whole moral of the story is that you have to look at the big picture as well as the small picture. I can relate this story to mocking jay, the third book of the hunger games trilogy. President coin was so focused on defeating the capitol, she forgot what the whole point of the rebellion was to begin with! She started using weapons against the capitol that harmed innocent people, but harming innocent people was something the rebels were trying to stop by overriding the capitol. I think that when you do something, instead of focusing on one little part of you job, you have to keep in mind the whole point of the job in the first place.

I really like the way a lot of David Sedaris's short stories end. They give you a lot to think about. Instead of giving you a happily ever after, he leaves the story open ended, so that you have to think about what is going to happen later on. A lot of times when I read a book, I dont really have to think about what happens after the story is over, I just think, oh, that was sad, or oh, that was happy, and I don't have to think about what will happen later on. For this story, there are a lot of things that could happen. Maybe the wolves take over and eat all the animals, leaving the forest a desolate patch of trees, not a heartbeat to be heard. Maybe the forest animals all work together to get rid of the wolves and the forest is safe once again. Maybe the wolves see the diamond and just stop in their tracks, gazing at the magnificent gemstone, and the cant take their eyes away, and they die of starvation, because how can they hunt! They must stare at the gem until they cant stare anymore. After reading the book, I felt something different about it then I ever had about a book. It was weird. I almost felt like the book was mine! That I had wrote it! That there was a little part of me in the book. I love David Sedaris.

I Turn to Fanfiction in a State of Depression

Harry Potter has been a part of my life since I was 5 years old. I waited for the books to come out, cried for all the characters, re-read each book more times then I can count, memorized full scenes of the movies, and crushed on Harry for all of my elementary school years. It's all ending. When the seventh book came out, I could handle the fact that I would never count down the days until the book came out, never have that feeling of reading a book like that for the first time. I still had the movies. Now, what will I do. I feel like going into a state of depression, and the movie hasn't even come out yet. I burst into tears after the trailer.

In this troubling time, I turn to fan fiction*. Some of them are not worth my time, being badly written. Also, I cant stand reading fan fictions about Harry, Ron, or Hermione. It's okay when they are in them, but when they're the main characters, the writers have them do and say things that J.K. Rowling would never write. I prefer reading about Draco or Ginny. Draco's character is easy to duplicate, and I don't really treasure Ginny as a character, so I don't care if the writers portray her in a way that Rowling would never do.

Recently, I was reading a particular D/G fan fiction that was incredible. It really brought back the rush of reading Harry Potter again. In this fan fiction, Draco leaves Voldemort, and is moved to the burrow for protection. As Ginny finds out, Draco had been beaten by his father, forced to hate muggle borns, and used by Voldemort in his plan to kill Dumbledore and shame Lucius. In telling her this, she confesses that she really cant stand her family. She loves her brothers, but they are super overprotective, and they never let her do anything. It's true. Ron flips out when she starts dating guys, when if given the chance when he was that age, he wouldn't have thought twice about it.

In the fan fiction, Ginny starts doing things just to make her family mad, and ends up really hurting Draco in the process.

If she had been given a little more freedom, she wouldn't've felt the need to do a whole bunch of horrible things. There has to be a happy medium, where Ginny can do things that she enjoys, but her brothers don't feel like their little sister is turning into a bad person.

The thing is, she wasn't even complaining about her parents, she didn't have problems with them, and they didn't have problems with her. To think that her brothers come down so hard on her when her parents don't mind is even more frustrating. She never gets her way on anything, and it isn't even the authoritative figures in her life that enforce these unfair rules. Well, Mr. and Mrs. Weasley should step in and help their daughter out.

*Fan fiction is: A piece of fiction within a fandom utilizing characters and situations from a pre-existing work including (but not limited to) books, television programs, films, and comic strips.

This definition has been copy and pasted from urban dictionary (urbandictionary.com) and because I have cited it it is not plagiarism.

Re-reading To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee

“It's a sin to kill a mockingbird.” This is because all the mockingbird does all day is sing, so why would you do away with such a beautiful sound? True, the mockingbird does sing, and the song it sings is pretty, but that shouldn't be the only reason to kill it. If the only reason for me to stay alive is that I play piano nicely, then kill me. I'd rather be dead.

What's the matter with a bluejay anyways? You can't kill the mockingbird, but go ahead, kill as many bluejays as you can. True, bluejays can't sing, they only chirp. For all that it's worth, I think that the chirping of the bluejay is just as pretty as the song of a mockingbird. The sound of their two voices combined into one harmony would be even prettier.

This time reading, I noticed that Scout doesn't mention her mom a lot. Yes, she talks about her occasionaly, but just to say that she doesn't have one, and that she cant remember a thing about her. I really respect Scout for that. She is perfectly contempt with her life, she doesnt need anything more. There are so many times in my life when I wish I had an older sister, or a younger brother, or something along those lines, but Scout doesn't even long for a mother. I respect the way she handles the loss of a mom.

The racism and prejudice in this book reminds me of homosexuality today. There are a lot of people I know who are homosexual, and there are also a bunch of people I know who are completely against it. When I'm talking to my friends about this awesome funny friend of mine, and then I mention his boyfriend, the mood of the conversation changes suddenly. It's like, everybody thought he was a cool guy, but then uh oh, he's gay, we hate him now, lets talk about something else. Some people can be so mean and horrible.

I bet if everyone put on blindfolds and walked around Maycomb, greeting people, meeting people, they would be surprised when everybody took off their blindfolds. It doesn't matter if someone has a different color skin, and it doesn't matter if someone's homosexual. They are the same person no matter what you see on the outside. Thats not how most people think about things in Maycomb. The only thing black people have done in the world is to benefit others, so why is it not a sin to kill them?

Little Women (again): Revised

As I said in my previous blog post about this book, (I apologize for the length of this classic novel, Little Women) each chapter is it's own little story with it's own moral. Well, the chapter I’m reading right now is about Meg, Jo, and Beth going to an island with Laurie, their friend. It starts out with them all getting invitations. Along with Jo's is a very big hat. She always complains that her face gets burnt in the sun, but she can’t wear a bigger hat because it's not in style. Laurie thinks that she is not the kind of person to let fashion get in the way of comfort. It's a little joke between her and Laurie.

I think that this part of the story is it's own little moral in itself. Jo isn't the kind of person to care about style, and yet, she still shows concern for fashion. Even the people who seem not to care about things in the slightest bit, think about them a little. Jo is a tomboy, or at least as tomboyish as you could be back then, and she really takes no notice of the latest fashions, but she wouldn't willingly cross a line and wear something crazy.

The thing is, she does wear the hat. It is not absurd, and she feels that there is no reason for her not to. Because she does wear the hat, it seems to me that she is going out of her way to be different, and to show that she doesn't care about clothing and being a proper young lady.

In it's own way, the fact that Jo wears the hat shows that she cares about fashion just as much as Amy, if you can believe it. She just chooses to wear everything that is not in style, rather then refuse to wear anything that isn't.

I think that I would rather be in Jo's position then Amy's. She is not afraid to wear anything she wants without suffering because of the clothing she is wearing because she feels the need to be in style. Although, there are disadvantages to being the way she is. She is the object of ridicule in many situations, and I'm not sure if I would rather be subject to that and be able to wear whatever I want then wear what is in style and suffer because of it. There is no way out!!

I would've thought that Jo wearing the hat would've been embarrassing for her, and made her feel self-conscious, but I was wrong. It created a laugh at the start of the trip, breaking the ice, and it would serve as a good umbrella in case of rain. Plus, Jo was not sunburned, and there was no peeling skin on her nose. Always a plus.

Jo didn't have to face the consequences that come with being different. I think that there should be no consequences to begin with, but a world without bullies is pretty far fetched. I wish it could be like that all the time, no worries about being teased or talked about behind your back, but thats not how it works in the world. I'll just have to make the most out of it.

Little Women (again)

             As I said in my previous blog post about this book (I’m sorry, it's really long!) each chapter is it's own little story with it's own little story. Well, the chapter I’m reading right now is about Meg, Jo, and Beth going to an island with Laurie, their friend. It starts out with them all getting invitations. Along with Jo's is a very big hat. It's a little joke between her and Laurie. She always complains that her face gets burnt in the sun, but she can’t wear a bigger hat because it's not in style. Laurie thinks that she is not the kind of person to let fashion get in the way of comfort, so he sends her the hat.

I think that this part of the story is it's own little moral in itself. Jo isn't the kind of person to care about style, and yet, she still shows concern for fashion. Even the people who seem not to care about things in the slightest bit think about them a little. Jo is a tomboy, or at least as tomboyish as you could be back then, and she really takes no notice of the latest fashions, but she wouldn't willingly cross a line and wear something crazy.

The thing is, she does wear the hat. It is not absurd, and she feels that there is no reason for her not to. Because she does wear the hat, it seems to me that she is going out of her way to be different, and to show that she doesn't care about clothing and being a proper young lady.

In it's own way, the fact that Jo wears the hat shows that she cares about fashion just as much as Amy, if you can believe it. She just chooses to wear everything that is not in style, rather then refuse to wear anything that isn't.

I think that I would rather be in Jo's position then Amy's. She is not afraid to wear anything she wants without suffering because of the clothing she is wearing because she feels the need to be in style. Although, there are disadvantages to being the way she is. She is the object of ridicule in many situations, and I'm not sure if I would rather be subject to that and be able to wear whatever I want then wear what is in style and suffer because of it. There is no way out!!

Well, the hat was very useful. It created a laugh at the start of the trip, breaking the ice, and it would serve as a good umbrella in case of rain. Plus, Jo was not sunburned, and there was no peeling skin on her nose. Always a plus.

Little Women

I'm currently reading Little Women, by Louisa May Alcott. If you aren't familiar with the book, it’s about four sisters, Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy. They live during the civil war, and they have to fend for themselves, because their father is at war. Their mother is still with them, but Meg and Jo, the oldest, still have to work. Each chapter of the book is essentially a life lesson; each one has some kind of moral. One that caught my attention was about Amy, the youngest.            

Amy is a persistent, materialistic schoolgirl. She is the only sister who goes to school (Beth stays at home and studies by herself), and she has many social issues with her classmates. She strives to please her friends, and so she is willing to do anything to get on their good side. In this chapter, Amy complains to Meg that she feels horrible because she has no money to buy limes. Her friends buy limes all the time and suck on them at recess. If you like someone, you give them a lime, and if you don’t, you eat one right in front of their faces without giving them even a lick. Amy tells Meg that some people are being mean to her because she has no limes. Meg, taking pity on her favorite sister, gives her a quarter. Amy gleefully buys 24 limes, all in one day. When she gets to school, she refuses to give any limes to the girl who was mean to her before. When Amy sneaks her great big bag of limes into her desk, she is tattled on. Her teacher makes her throw all the limes out of the window. After that, he hits her hand with a ruler three times, and makes her stand up by the blackboard until recess, instead of letting her go sit down.

I think that this one caught my attention because there are two sides to the story. Of course, Amy should've spent her money more sparingly, to prevent her from breaking school rules. The thing is, the teacher didn't handle the situation very well at all. I know that the times are different now, and corporal punishment was standard in school, but I would think that even then, having her throw away the limes and have her stand up by the board to wallow in her shame would be enough.

Then there is the tattletale. I believe her name is jenny. This young character Jenny can do nothing but wrong here, can she! This all wouldn’t have happened in the first place is she hadn't tormented Amy about not having any limes! Isn't enough for Amy not to have delicious limes to suck on like everyone else, but then to get ridiculed in front of her friends and peers! Then the tattletale epidemic after that! Why exactly did Jenny do it? I'm going to break it down.

Number one: Why Jenny made fun of Amy in the first place:

a. She was offended that Amy did not give her any limes

b. She wanted attention from the other girls

c. She was hiding the fact that she did not have very many limes

d. She wanted to provoke Amy into buying limes and giving one to her

Number two: Why she tattled on Amy about the limes in her desk:

a. She was angry with Amy for refusing to give her a lime

b. She wanted to get on the teacher's good side

c. She wanted attention from the other girls

d. She wanted to distract the teacher from the fact that she had limes in her desk

Number three: Why tattling was a very bad idea:

a. Everyone will be mad at her

b. Amy will be very mad at her, and Amy is a beast when it comes to revenge. See chapter 8 for proof

c. She will have lost any chances of getting any limes from Amy

Harry Potter 5

I have just finished re-reading Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. It was break. I was bored. Don't judge!! Harry Potter is God!!

I've always been the kind of reader who gets really into certain books, (e.g. Harry Potter) because of the interesting plot line. After having that experience with a book like that, I would expect it from other books, and not get it. I want that rush in my stomach while turning a page, knowing something is going to happen. While I admire J.K. Rowling for her genius plot, her writing is rubbish. See! I’m even using British words.

When I first read the 5^th book, I was in 2^nd grade. My teacher was impressed, but I told her I didn't really understand a lot of the words on the page, which is reasonable. Rowling didn't write the books for 7 year olds, and she uses some surprisingly challenging vocabulary. The climaxes of the books have no inner meaning whatsoever. The fact that Harry is fighting the Death Eaters has no substance at all. This is why, at age 7, I enjoyed the books so much. I didn't need to really read the book to enjoy it. I was an incredibly fast reader, not really taking in any of the words on the page. I read to know what happened next, not what was actually going on.

I re-read all the books all the time, especially the 6^th one, which is my favorite, closely followed by the 7^th. Each time I read them over again, I focus on a different aspect of the book. The first time, the plot, the second time, the details I missed the first time, the third time, the characters, the fourth time, the thoughts, the fifth time I have no idea. At least, this is what it was like for me with the 5^th book. This was the fourth time I read the book, but I was kind of in between characters and thoughts, because the first time really doesn't count, I mean, I was only 7 years old!

The character I focused on was Professor Umbridge. She is a horrible person, who has some really horrible views on things like half-breeds. Naturally, I agree with Harry and the rest of the Gryffindor that she is a horrible person and teacher. It is not Harry that I disagree with, it's J.K. Rowling. By creating an adult like that, she makes it seem like it's a good thing to do bad things to teachers because of the way they teach. The reasons that Umbridge acted the way she did about teaching was reasonable, because she honestly didn't believe anything harry said, and she thought the students and Dumbledore were going to try and fight against the Ministry so that Dumbledore could be Minister of Magic. If this were the case, it would be good for Umbridge to go to all the lengths that she did to prevent that from happening.

Rowling makes it okay for the students to do horrible things to the teacher. Because Harry Potter is such a popular book for small children, this is not a very good thing for Rowling to put in her books. It makes it seem like it's okay to misbehave if the adult in question has some different views on things than you.